Jump to content


Photo

Atomic 3DMark & Game Benchmark Rankings


  • Please log in to reply
812 replies to this topic

#801 gamble

gamble

    Primarch

  • Atomican
  • 1,357 posts

Posted 16 January 2018 - 12:27 PM

So, I sold the RX 56 only because of the crazy prices they are going for used.  I bought a Asus Strix GTX 1080Ti OC from that which was nearly a wash, I think I paid $10 bucks after fees on ebay.   Few results below, I dont have my cpu clocked up but at my daily 4ghz.  There is one bad, well kinda strange thing about this card... It clocks without changing anything up to 1924-1949mhz at stock.  If I up the power limit to 120% it stays closer to the 1949mhz and if I up the voltage all the way up to 1.093v it usually is around 1962 to 1949mhz.  Great right, should OC like a boss?? Nope!  I can only get about +20 from there and will not hit 2000mhz.  Now, I really dont mind since it is a high OC right from the box without having to do anything but its strange that I cant really push it anymore and really it is not even worth running it at +20...  The cooler is unreal though.  It runs up to 40% at the highest I have seen, cant hear it at all and has not hit over 69c yet even when gaming or benching.  Still playing with the ram but it hit 12000 no problem and wanted to run some benches.  I dont think Ill be able to catch Mark84 :( even if I push the cpu and ram more but still happy with the results over the RX 56..  Still looking at Dasa scores its hard to believe he pushed his to those great scores too considering its a GTX 1070.   Ill probably try to up the cpu some just because Id like to hit 20k/10k in FS/TimeSpy. 

 

FireStrike:  19606 - https://www.3dmark.com/fs/14708608

TimeSpy:  9837 - https://www.3dmark.com/spy/3146034

 

For those curious on Superposition, I ran this with the RX 56 and RX 64 bios for the below:

 

Performance - 1080p Extreme preset - DirectX

RX56:  3299

RX56(RX64 bios):  3809

1080ti Ram OC:  6052

1080ti:  5840


Edited by gamble, 16 January 2018 - 12:42 PM.

HAF 912 | Biostar x370GT7 | 1700x @ 4ghz | Asus Strix GTX 1080ti @ 1962c/12000m | EVGA RAM @ 2933mhz  | EK Watercooled CPU | EVGA G2 1300W 


#802 Dasa

Dasa

    Guru

  • Super Hero
  • 14,884 posts

Posted 16 January 2018 - 02:45 PM

wonder why ryzen does so badly in the combined score my 6700k is 60% faster yet your 30% faster in both gpu and physic tests

sure its probably single threaded but still the difference shouldn't be that much


Silverstone TJ08-EW 6700k@4.7 1.375v - Z170-GENE - 2x8g 3866 16-16-16 - 1070@ 2100\9600MHz  -Samsung 830 64G, Sandisk Ultra II 960G, WD Green 3tb - Seasonic XP1050 - Dell U2713 - Pioneer Todoroki 5.1 Apogee Drive II - EK VGA-HF Supreme  - Phobia 200mm Rad - Silverstone AP181 Project Darkling
3770k vs 6700k RAM Scaling, HT vs RAM, Arma III CPU vs RAM, Thief CPU vs RAM
Parts Guide


#803 gamble

gamble

    Primarch

  • Atomican
  • 1,357 posts

Posted 16 January 2018 - 03:13 PM

Maybe because yours is running 800mhz higher... Still piss poor combined score for sure. There's a bios update for my board but they took out OC option for some reason and supposed another bios coming to fix vulnerability.

Edit: Found this similar setup, combined score looks much better than mine but looks like he/she ran near the same clocks but higher ram frequency... Maybe I'll try to flash the bios on mb again, possibly it didn't take well. https://www.3dmark.com/fs/13060141

Edited by gamble, 16 January 2018 - 03:37 PM.

HAF 912 | Biostar x370GT7 | 1700x @ 4ghz | Asus Strix GTX 1080ti @ 1962c/12000m | EVGA RAM @ 2933mhz  | EK Watercooled CPU | EVGA G2 1300W 


#804 Dasa

Dasa

    Guru

  • Super Hero
  • 14,884 posts

Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:40 PM

what speed is your ram running? sora3 managed .11fps more than you in the combined test with 2666 ram


Silverstone TJ08-EW 6700k@4.7 1.375v - Z170-GENE - 2x8g 3866 16-16-16 - 1070@ 2100\9600MHz  -Samsung 830 64G, Sandisk Ultra II 960G, WD Green 3tb - Seasonic XP1050 - Dell U2713 - Pioneer Todoroki 5.1 Apogee Drive II - EK VGA-HF Supreme  - Phobia 200mm Rad - Silverstone AP181 Project Darkling
3770k vs 6700k RAM Scaling, HT vs RAM, Arma III CPU vs RAM, Thief CPU vs RAM
Parts Guide


#805 SceptreCore

SceptreCore

    Guru

  • Atomican
  • 9,926 posts

Posted 17 January 2018 - 01:17 AM

So, I sold the RX 56 only because of the crazy prices they are going for used.  I bought a Asus Strix GTX 1080Ti OC 

You need to update your bio now ;)


RIG: Phenom II X6 1090T @ 4.0GHz | MSI 990FXA GD-80 | 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz 9-9-9-24 | MSI Radeon R7 370 | Patriot Pyro SSD 120GB SATAIII | 500GB + 1TB Barracuda's | LG GH22NS70 DVD-RW | Xigmatek Red Scorpion | Corsair HX650W | CM690


#806 gamble

gamble

    Primarch

  • Atomican
  • 1,357 posts

Posted 17 January 2018 - 02:22 AM

Currently, at 2933... Looking at previous scores I remember saying "I dont know how I got this score" with the RX 56 as it was much higher than most of my other scores even rerunning over and over trying to reproduce.  But, my combined score was high and other runs it was low...  strange stuff, Ill dig in more soon.

--

Yea will update sig now thanks for the reminder!


HAF 912 | Biostar x370GT7 | 1700x @ 4ghz | Asus Strix GTX 1080ti @ 1962c/12000m | EVGA RAM @ 2933mhz  | EK Watercooled CPU | EVGA G2 1300W 


#807 Dasa

Dasa

    Guru

  • Super Hero
  • 14,884 posts

Posted 17 January 2018 - 08:31 AM

showed this to sora3 on the last page but i don't think it was much help to him maybe you will have better luck

http://www.overclock...-problems-ahead

34d43e00_StockCP.jpeg

983c63e1_CombinedBDDRadjust.jpeg


Edited by Dasa, 17 January 2018 - 08:31 AM.

Silverstone TJ08-EW 6700k@4.7 1.375v - Z170-GENE - 2x8g 3866 16-16-16 - 1070@ 2100\9600MHz  -Samsung 830 64G, Sandisk Ultra II 960G, WD Green 3tb - Seasonic XP1050 - Dell U2713 - Pioneer Todoroki 5.1 Apogee Drive II - EK VGA-HF Supreme  - Phobia 200mm Rad - Silverstone AP181 Project Darkling
3770k vs 6700k RAM Scaling, HT vs RAM, Arma III CPU vs RAM, Thief CPU vs RAM
Parts Guide


#808 gamble

gamble

    Primarch

  • Atomican
  • 1,357 posts

Posted 17 January 2018 - 12:55 PM

Thx Dasa, it has to be something with that. I installed Ryzen power plan last year and when I looked it wasn't even there anymore but there has been some major updates lately. When I re-download it, it wouldn't downclock the cores on either Ryzen balance or performance modes. Only win 10 balance would drop the clocks down when not being used. Looking at resource management I do not have any parked cores. I ran out of time but it just seems like poor optimization on Futuremark side but to be fair it's been out a long time now. Looking at all the charts if I put parked at 50% it should yield better results... I need to read more since I'm still confused on how it work and why.

HAF 912 | Biostar x370GT7 | 1700x @ 4ghz | Asus Strix GTX 1080ti @ 1962c/12000m | EVGA RAM @ 2933mhz  | EK Watercooled CPU | EVGA G2 1300W 


#809 Dasa

Dasa

    Guru

  • Super Hero
  • 14,884 posts

Posted 17 January 2018 - 06:38 PM

like you say there has been a lot of updates that were supposed to fix a lot of these issues so that link i provided may not be relevant anymore but his scores do seem to be in the ballpark of where you are and where you should be


Silverstone TJ08-EW 6700k@4.7 1.375v - Z170-GENE - 2x8g 3866 16-16-16 - 1070@ 2100\9600MHz  -Samsung 830 64G, Sandisk Ultra II 960G, WD Green 3tb - Seasonic XP1050 - Dell U2713 - Pioneer Todoroki 5.1 Apogee Drive II - EK VGA-HF Supreme  - Phobia 200mm Rad - Silverstone AP181 Project Darkling
3770k vs 6700k RAM Scaling, HT vs RAM, Arma III CPU vs RAM, Thief CPU vs RAM
Parts Guide


#810 gamble

gamble

    Primarch

  • Atomican
  • 1,357 posts

Posted 18 January 2018 - 11:43 AM

To be honest, I have no idea why now I can get nearly 21k with the exact same setting.... I changed nothing in the bios.  The card is running at the clocks as before.  My combined score jumped to 6767...  I do not see an option for parked cores and how to set this as the screenshots showed in those posts.  I can set min/max on the processors though.  Using Ryzen balance would fail when I get to the physic test, the same is true using win10 High performance.  Then I went back to win10 balanced and bam, 21k score.  Possibly, it was just luck of the core threads and where they landed.  Still think for a benching program they would try to make this better for all cpus. 

 

20929 - https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/24679858?

 

compare - https://www.3dmark.c...08/fs/14723706#

 

Ill give it a few more runs to see if this is repeatable. 

 

Edit:  No, it is not repeatable meaning 50% of the time it will run great and other times I will get my 1st score with the same combined.... so annoying but glad you mentioned.  


Edited by gamble, 18 January 2018 - 11:55 AM.

HAF 912 | Biostar x370GT7 | 1700x @ 4ghz | Asus Strix GTX 1080ti @ 1962c/12000m | EVGA RAM @ 2933mhz  | EK Watercooled CPU | EVGA G2 1300W 


#811 Dasa

Dasa

    Guru

  • Super Hero
  • 14,884 posts

Posted 18 January 2018 - 12:27 PM

Possibly, it was just luck of the core threads and where they landed.

guess that could be it with the two groups of cores and the high latency interface between them


Silverstone TJ08-EW 6700k@4.7 1.375v - Z170-GENE - 2x8g 3866 16-16-16 - 1070@ 2100\9600MHz  -Samsung 830 64G, Sandisk Ultra II 960G, WD Green 3tb - Seasonic XP1050 - Dell U2713 - Pioneer Todoroki 5.1 Apogee Drive II - EK VGA-HF Supreme  - Phobia 200mm Rad - Silverstone AP181 Project Darkling
3770k vs 6700k RAM Scaling, HT vs RAM, Arma III CPU vs RAM, Thief CPU vs RAM
Parts Guide


#812 gamble

gamble

    Primarch

  • Atomican
  • 1,357 posts

Posted 19 January 2018 - 03:48 AM

I opened a ticket with support, just to ask, below is their official rep reply.  Basically, what we thought on the core threads and how win10 assigned them can impact performance:

 

Subject:  Ryzen and Combined Score Inconsistent

 

Me:

"FireStrike with Ryzen is inconsistent on combined score. Same setting but will yield different results each time I run this. Several others in forums have noted the same issue. It seems like FS is not optimized for Ryzen. Please let me know when the patch will come out to address this. Ryzen2 coming soon so everyone will be running these benchmarks."

 

Rep:

"More like Ryzen is not optimized for all applications. This is how Ryzen works on any number of games etc. We have no plans to change the test in any way as changing it would invalidate all existing benchmark scores. It is quite accurate test for older DX11 games that do not have specific code paths for Ryzen - basically the result depends on which core Windows happens to put the benchmark vs. where video driver process is. Core-to-Core communication can be fast or slow, depending on that.

Beyond that, Time Spy and Time Spy Extreme are better tests for modern hardware."

 

===

 

Anyone using Superposition benchmark?  Ive been using Performance - 1080p Extreme preset - DirectX.  


Edited by gamble, 19 January 2018 - 03:52 AM.

HAF 912 | Biostar x370GT7 | 1700x @ 4ghz | Asus Strix GTX 1080ti @ 1962c/12000m | EVGA RAM @ 2933mhz  | EK Watercooled CPU | EVGA G2 1300W 


#813 Dasa

Dasa

    Guru

  • Super Hero
  • 14,884 posts

Posted 19 January 2018 - 06:46 AM

gave it a quick run

Superposition_Benchmark_v1.0_4012_151630


Silverstone TJ08-EW 6700k@4.7 1.375v - Z170-GENE - 2x8g 3866 16-16-16 - 1070@ 2100\9600MHz  -Samsung 830 64G, Sandisk Ultra II 960G, WD Green 3tb - Seasonic XP1050 - Dell U2713 - Pioneer Todoroki 5.1 Apogee Drive II - EK VGA-HF Supreme  - Phobia 200mm Rad - Silverstone AP181 Project Darkling
3770k vs 6700k RAM Scaling, HT vs RAM, Arma III CPU vs RAM, Thief CPU vs RAM
Parts Guide





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users