Jump to content


Photo

What is most important to you in Graphics Cards?

graphics gpu vga graphics cards

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 Roscosity

Roscosity

    Learner

  • Quark
  • 46 posts
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 01 December 2015 - 02:09 PM

As the title says, what's most important to you guys in terms of graphics cards?

-Value, efficiency, performance, performance per dollar, future-ready, etc

 

Let me know :)


Roscosity | Gigabyte ANZ Community Manager

#2 Jeruselem

Jeruselem

    Guru

  • Atomican
  • 13,892 posts
  • Location:Not Trump-Land

Posted 01 December 2015 - 02:12 PM

Driver stability!


Edited by Jeruselem, 01 December 2015 - 02:13 PM.

Is your Android and iOS WiFi on KRACK?


#3 Rybags

Rybags

    Immortal

  • Super Hero
  • 35,020 posts

Posted 01 December 2015 - 02:46 PM

Performance, price/performance obviously.

 

What's nice though is one that doesn't suck a lot of juice and create an oven inside the case.

Problem there though is leading edge rarely means cool running.



#4 Dasa

Dasa

    Guru

  • Super Hero
  • 14,848 posts

Posted 01 December 2015 - 06:43 PM

enough performance to do the job at a good price

efficiency is nice but not worth paying a heap extra for or dropping performance below a satisfactory level

driver stability? not really much of a choice as it varies depending on the other software and month to month as to which is best mostly there acceptable with a single gpu

overclocking head room is also a consideration for me as part of the cards value

 

not that power use is that bad this is the max power spike recorded in 3dmark
3770k@4.2ghz 1.27v 2133 10-10-10 1.45v
seasonic xp1050
2hdd ssd bdr

3dm 9741 980\1250mhz power limit 0% 328.0w
3dm 10541 1100\1350mhz power limit 50% +0mv 345.8w
3dm 11065 1200\1400mhz power limit 50% +113mv 404.6w

psu is operating at ~93% efficiency at that load so 328w drops to ~305w actual draw from the psu with the gpu at stock clocks and the cpu overclocked
some games do use more power than 3dmark though


Silverstone TJ08-EW 6700k@4.7 1.375v - Z170-GENE - 2x8g 3866 16-16-16 - 1070@ 2100\9600MHz  -Samsung 830 64G, Sandisk Ultra II 960G, WD Green 3tb - Seasonic XP1050 - Dell U2713 - Pioneer Todoroki 5.1 Apogee Drive II - EK VGA-HF Supreme  - Phobia 200mm Rad - Silverstone AP181 Project Darkling
3770k vs 6700k RAM Scaling, HT vs RAM, Arma III CPU vs RAM, Thief CPU vs RAM
Parts Guide


#5 aquaius

aquaius

    Serf

  • Lurker
  • 5 posts

Posted 01 December 2015 - 07:22 PM

Performance/price, if not just outright performance. The ability to overclock several % out of the card is also nice.



#6 gamble

gamble

    Primarch

  • Atomican
  • 1,344 posts

Posted 02 December 2015 - 09:14 AM

Price/performance but like quality parts too like vrm's and heatsink. I'd be willing to pay a bit more for better built card for OC.

HAF 912 | Biostar x370GT7 | 1700x @ 4ghz | PowerColor RX 56 (RX 64 Bios) @ 1600c/945mhz | EVGA RAM @ 2933mhz  | EK Watercooled CPU | EVGA G2 1300W 


#7 Chaos.Lady

Chaos.Lady

    Goddess

  • Mod
  • 79,434 posts
  • Location:In your head

Posted 02 December 2015 - 04:43 PM

Currently going through this with my new build.

 

AMD vs Nvidia - doesn't seem much in it these days.  How do you trust any of them when you know they are fiddling benchmarks?

 

I look at price vs performance and drivers I guess.  The bottom line is that there is always a new card just around the corner that is better and faster and higher spec.  It's bloody hard to keep up with the curve.

 

I guess temperature under load is something I look at too - extra heat is extra heat.


Edited by Chaos.Lady, 02 December 2015 - 04:44 PM.

In the light universe I have been darkness. Perhaps in the dark zone I can be light...
 
Take the boat, promise me 
Never to tell
The secrets you know,
Of the Angel in Hell.


#8 .:Cyb3rGlitch:.

.:Cyb3rGlitch:.

    Hero

  • Mod
  • 21,368 posts

Posted 02 December 2015 - 05:06 PM

Noise is a factor. Low cost/performance ratio as long as it can handle a good FPS for the types of games I want to play. To a lesser extent, driver quality


"We are a way for the cosmos to know itself." - Carl Sagan
"I do not fear death. I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it." - Mark Twain
 
An open mind is willing to consider new ideas, while provisionally accepting those backed by empirical evidence, and provisionally rejecting those without.


#9 aquaius

aquaius

    Serf

  • Lurker
  • 5 posts

Posted 02 December 2015 - 06:19 PM

Currently going through this with my new build.

 

AMD vs Nvidia - doesn't seem much in it these days.  How do you trust any of them when you know they are fiddling benchmarks?

 

I look at price vs performance and drivers I guess.  The bottom line is that there is always a new card just around the corner that is better and faster and higher spec.  It's bloody hard to keep up with the curve.

 

I guess temperature under load is something I look at too - extra heat is extra heat.

Have you tried looking at third party benchmarks? I usually compare benchmarks everywhere and check up 3dmark results.



#10 Nich...

Nich...

    Professional Tart

  • Mod
  • 43,213 posts
  • Location:Mexico

Posted 03 December 2015 - 11:47 PM

Single word answer? No.

Things I considered with my most recent GPU purchase:

How noisy it was at idle and under load (not something I considered in past builds, much to my laterannoyance)
Power usage/heat output (moreso an issue with the above acting as a constraint)
Price:performance. This one is hard for me to pin down; I usually don't like spending more than about $300 on a GPU, but I was happy with what I paid for this ASUS 970.
Driver support/stability. CTDs are a pain but BSODs and hardlocks are worse. Not much that can be done from my end, tho'. Definitely made me rank AMD much lower while they sort their shit out.

Vendor specific stuff? Whether the market segments they're targeting fit my specific usecase, as per above. I think my last AMD GPU was Gigabyte just based on low-ish price and 'enough' features.
"I think it is a sad reflection on our civilization that while we can and do measure the temperature in the atmosphere of Venus we do not know what goes on inside our soufflés" -- Nicholas Kurti

#11 SonOfNoddy

SonOfNoddy

    Snotblock

  • Atomican
  • 640 posts
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 04 December 2015 - 02:34 PM

Cooling and future-ready.


Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

#12 Master_Scythe

Master_Scythe

    Titan

  • Hero
  • 20,103 posts
  • Location:QLD

Posted 06 December 2015 - 10:46 PM

Reliability under extreme conditions (solid caps, high heat rated everything)

Driver stability.

Cooling.

 

 

THe reason reliability is so important is because It comes into noise (how low you can lock the fan profile), stability (overclock), Australian temps (my office is 45*C on most afternoons, add into that gaming load, and she needs to stay stable at 110*C sometimes).


Wherever you go in life, watch out for Scythe, the tackling IT support guy.

"I don't care what race you are, not one f*cking bit, if you want to be seen as a good people, you go in there and you f*ck up the people who (unofficially) represent you in a negative light!"


#13 RenascentMisanthropy

RenascentMisanthropy

    Guru

  • Atomican
  • 9,669 posts
  • Location:Perth

Posted 15 December 2015 - 09:11 PM

Most important thing to me is that it plays my games with reasonable performance


Slycake i7 6700 + cyrorig r1 ultimate, asus z170m-plus, 16gb corsair 3200, evga gtx 970 4gb, 256gb m2 sammy pro, 1tb sshd, corsair cs650m.


#14 Nicxh

Nicxh

    Serf

  • Lurker
  • 7 posts

Posted 11 January 2016 - 03:46 PM

the most important for me in terms of graphics card is the performance. You should buy a decent video card that have a good quality and also affordable.



#15 Opy

Opy

    Primarch

  • Atomican
  • 1,628 posts

Posted 04 February 2016 - 05:00 AM

Currently I try to find out if it is a reference board that will accept a 3rd party water block.  Beyond that I'll consider factory overclocks and pricing.

Purely due to the 3D Vision glasses that I never use, I only seriously consider nVidia.


Reality is just an illusion brought on by a lack of alcohol.

WoT quote: "DishD (5:45:44 PM) ur a bad man Opy, funny as fuk but very Bad!"

QUOTE (Mac Dude @ May 15 2014, 06:47 PM) * I'm in. I'm so serious about this that I've already had 2 practice losses!


#16 Dasa

Dasa

    Guru

  • Super Hero
  • 14,848 posts

Posted 04 February 2016 - 06:22 AM

i prefer universal waterblocks and a heastsink on the vrm my current gpu block on the 290 is about 10 years old i just spent $15 to get a vrm heatsink for it as the one the came with the card was crap


Silverstone TJ08-EW 6700k@4.7 1.375v - Z170-GENE - 2x8g 3866 16-16-16 - 1070@ 2100\9600MHz  -Samsung 830 64G, Sandisk Ultra II 960G, WD Green 3tb - Seasonic XP1050 - Dell U2713 - Pioneer Todoroki 5.1 Apogee Drive II - EK VGA-HF Supreme  - Phobia 200mm Rad - Silverstone AP181 Project Darkling
3770k vs 6700k RAM Scaling, HT vs RAM, Arma III CPU vs RAM, Thief CPU vs RAM
Parts Guide


#17 kikz

kikz

    Titan

  • Hero
  • 19,502 posts
  • Location:Your Mums' place ;)

Posted 25 February 2016 - 10:30 PM

Triple screen performance.  That is super important.  



#18 Mr.Twinkie

Mr.Twinkie

    Overlord

  • Atomican
  • 3,328 posts
  • Location:Check your windows....

Posted 28 March 2016 - 10:34 AM

Performance per dollar.

 

I usually lean towards AMD these days just because of how unethical Nvidia has been of late with their monopolising Gameworks and etc.

 

I sometimes wonder what would've happened if ATI didn't get bought by AMD. Maybe ATI would've done better right now....


PC Specs: ASUS P7P55D-E Deluxe | i7 860 | R9 390 | Corsair TX-750W | 4GB G-Skill Ripjaws + 8GB Corsair Dominator | Antec 902 Case | ASUS MG279Q IPS Freesync Monitor

 

My momma always said I was special.


#19 Roscosity

Roscosity

    Learner

  • Quark
  • 46 posts
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 29 March 2016 - 12:20 PM

Performance per dollar.

 

I usually lean towards AMD these days just because of how unethical Nvidia has been of late with their monopolising Gameworks and etc.

 

I sometimes wonder what would've happened if ATI didn't get bought by AMD. Maybe ATI would've done better right now....

 

Is that up to a certain budget? Or just making the best value choice regardless of cost?


Roscosity | Gigabyte ANZ Community Manager

#20 Metla

Metla

    Serf

  • Lurker
  • 1 posts

Posted 10 April 2016 - 11:54 AM

I pick a budget first off, $300 is my sweet spot, Then see what card gives the best performance for my nominated budget.

 

If it looks like Im not going to get thr required increase in or level of performance then I bump up the budget a little.

 

Dont run overclocks, dont care about noise, heat or energy use. (though have come unstuck when I went to fit a card and it was 3cm's to loong for my case....)







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: graphics, gpu, vga, graphics cards

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users