Jump to content


Photo

Same-sex postal survey is a go


  • Please log in to reply
130 replies to this topic

#1 Mac Dude

Mac Dude

    Immortal

  • Super Hero
  • 36,561 posts
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 07 September 2017 - 02:41 PM

The High Court has just handed down their decision to let the survey proceed.

http://www.abc.net.a...ember-7/8880598

The decision was unanimous.

Now that it's a go, I thought it would be interesting to get people's thoughts on what the Yes/No breakdown will be. No prizes for guessing right :)

EDIT : Oh, my guess is the result will be 58% Yes.

Edited by Mac Dude, 07 September 2017 - 03:10 PM.

Karl Kruszelnicki - No, I’m fully prepared to believe in the “Church of God the Utterly Indifferent who sets the universe going and says you’re on your own kids.

#2 chrisg

chrisg

    Immortal

  • Super Hero
  • 34,752 posts
  • Location:Perth

Posted 07 September 2017 - 03:19 PM

Somewhere around there I'd expect Mac.

 

Personally I don't think it is any business of politicians and a complete and utter waste of money, spoken as a total heterosexual :)

 

Cheers


"Specialisation is for Insects" RAH

#3 stuub27

stuub27

    Overlord

  • Atomican
  • 3,225 posts

Posted 07 September 2017 - 04:41 PM

I just hope this leads to a speedy conclusion...or, at least, that my general lack of faith in people to not be dicks over the next weeks/months is not proven too conclusively.

 

I'll go 63% yes



#4 SnowSquirrel

SnowSquirrel

    Overlord

  • Atomican
  • 2,955 posts

Posted 07 September 2017 - 05:49 PM

69% yes

#5 Cybes

Cybes

    Titan

  • Atomican
  • 18,056 posts
  • Location:Where I am

Posted 07 September 2017 - 06:30 PM

Are we betting on the plebiscite result, or the outcome? Because it doesn't matter what we want, the LNP is going to vote 'No'.

"Reality does not care what you think." - Dr Richard Feynman
"There is no "I" in team." - "True.  I will not be found in any team."


#6 Nich...

Nich...

    Professional Tart

  • Mod
  • 43,271 posts
  • Location:Mexico

Posted 07 September 2017 - 06:32 PM

Anything less than 55:45, either way, is going to cause a lot of drama.  I'd like to see 60+ for yes, tho' I'd also like to see more media showing the number of groups you'd think would be voting no - like Catholics among other Christians - have a strong yes vote within them.

I'm not sure we'll see more than an 80% turnout, tho', in which case even a 60% win is going to be seen as not a majority, in some quarters.


"I think it is a sad reflection on our civilization that while we can and do measure the temperature in the atmosphere of Venus we do not know what goes on inside our soufflés" -- Nicholas Kurti

#7 eveln

eveln

    Titan

  • Atomican
  • 16,389 posts
  • Location:Nth QLD

Posted 07 September 2017 - 06:48 PM

this thread needs a poll


 Laugh to Live . Live to Laugh.

atomic has π


#8 Mac Dude

Mac Dude

    Immortal

  • Super Hero
  • 36,561 posts
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 07 September 2017 - 07:46 PM

Are we betting on the plebiscite result, or the outcome? Because it doesn't matter what we want, the LNP is going to vote 'No'.


The thread is about the survey, so that's what I'm asking :)

What happens from there is another question.

Oh as far as forum polls are concerned, can you put your own value like a percentage in a poll?
Karl Kruszelnicki - No, I’m fully prepared to believe in the “Church of God the Utterly Indifferent who sets the universe going and says you’re on your own kids.

#9 Cybes

Cybes

    Titan

  • Atomican
  • 18,056 posts
  • Location:Where I am

Posted 07 September 2017 - 08:26 PM

Oh as far as forum polls are concerned, can you put your own value like a percentage in a poll?


Not exactly sure what you're asking for, but if it's my 'bet': 70-75% in favour, based on the (small group of) people I talk to down here: Nobody really gives a blank about it one way or the other, but don't want to stand in anyone else's way to happiness.

"Reality does not care what you think." - Dr Richard Feynman
"There is no "I" in team." - "True.  I will not be found in any team."


#10 Mac Dude

Mac Dude

    Immortal

  • Super Hero
  • 36,561 posts
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 07 September 2017 - 09:17 PM

Oh as far as forum polls are concerned, can you put your own value like a percentage in a poll?


Not exactly sure what you're asking for, but if it's my 'bet': 70-75% in favour, based on the (small group of) people I talk to down here: Nobody really gives a blank about it one way or the other, but don't want to stand in anyone else's way to happiness.


No, the whole point is providing your predicted result, not 4 groups of different percentage ranges.
Karl Kruszelnicki - No, I’m fully prepared to believe in the “Church of God the Utterly Indifferent who sets the universe going and says you’re on your own kids.

#11 i_am_banned2

i_am_banned2

    Primarch

  • Atomican
  • 1,689 posts

Posted 07 September 2017 - 10:12 PM

...don't want to stand in anyone else's way to happiness.

 

Marriage = Happiness?
 
No married person would ever make such a wild assertion. Let's be honest, the whole marriage equality issue is nothing but a Machiavellian scheme designed to punish the Gay community. The Heterosexuals have long been jealously eyeing off the Gays' free and flamboyant lifestyle, patiently plotting a way to spectacularly crush it. Now the bait has been taken and the trap is almost ready to be sprung. Turn back, you fools! Turn back before it's too late!


#12 @~thehung

@~thehung

    Guru

  • Hero
  • 8,638 posts

Posted 08 September 2017 - 02:16 AM

i think it will be a lowish number disproportionate to the real sentiment of the people.

why?

i suspect potential negative voters are fairly homogeneous in terms of being highly motivated to participate, whereas potential positive voters sit on a much wider spectrum between enthusiasm and indifference, not to mention those who are antagonistic towards the whole damned sham of a process.
 


no pung intended

#13 TheManFromPOST

TheManFromPOST

    Not to be trifled with

  • Hero
  • 8,503 posts

Posted 08 September 2017 - 02:46 AM

i hope the returns are high and a clear majority is reached
it is such a third level issue

60% + yes

#14 @~thehung

@~thehung

    Guru

  • Hero
  • 8,638 posts

Posted 08 September 2017 - 02:51 AM

...Because it doesn't matter what we want, the LNP is going to vote 'No'.

 

what do you think their play is, really?  i just dont get it.

 

i have not seen much public discussion about this — it has mostly been whining about the supposed emotional toll of the debate.  okay, so we know that when Bernardi defected its not like he made much of a dent on the extreme conservative composition of the party.  but whose strategy is this, and why?  no matter which way i look at it, even somehow allowing for very smart people who just happen to believe gayness is 'against god', i cant locate any intelligence in their motivations.  yeah, haha because the NLP are mostly regressive fuckwits... but even my most plausible of theories are so shaky.  cui bono?


no pung intended

#15 Sir_Substance

Sir_Substance

    Guru

  • Atomican
  • 15,776 posts

Posted 08 September 2017 - 03:50 AM

You're all very pessimistic, I suspect it'll be ~70% yes.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but because of the way this is being run, voting isn't mandatory? So it's about which side of the two extremes is less apathetic, and I'd wager the liberals are more energetic than the conservatives.
 

i hope the returns are high and a clear majority is reached
it is such a third level issue

 
This is another reason I think we'll see a clear majority. Truthfully, I don't really care that much about gay marriage as an issue. That might be hurtful to some people for whom this is their whole world, but no one can care about everything, and this is a non-issue for me. As such, I'm inclined to vote yes because it seems like the speediest way to get parliament to stop tying itself in knots over the damn thing and move on to real issues. I think we'll see a protest turnout from people who would otherwise be on the fence and maybe voting no.


Edited by Sir_Substance, 08 September 2017 - 03:50 AM.

Kablez- You can only beat a brick wall with so many sticks until... you wasted all your time collecting and breaking sticks against a wall... Tantryl- Knowledge is the new power, but will never provide a stable baseload as cost effective as burning puppies. mm80x: I allege that Sir substance must be from the internet

#16 Cybes

Cybes

    Titan

  • Atomican
  • 18,056 posts
  • Location:Where I am

Posted 08 September 2017 - 05:44 AM

...and I'd wager the liberals are more energetic than the conservatives.

One can only hope, but that's pretty much the polar opposite of the voluntary US election system. The lefties (less right?) always have more trouble getting people to turn up.


Marriage = Happiness?
 
No married person would ever make such a wild assertion.

Nor would I. However, being able to visit your loved one when thay are dying would be nice; keeping the child you have raised together would also; being elligable to collect their super/pension as well.



what do you think their play is, really?  i just dont get it.


They want to appear to be taking note of public opinion whilst following the dictates of their own '50s morality.

This is what happens when the upper echelon of your Party is occupied with old Churchy types, and your Constitution has no clause about seperation of Church and State.

Edited by Cybes, 08 September 2017 - 05:37 AM.

"Reality does not care what you think." - Dr Richard Feynman
"There is no "I" in team." - "True.  I will not be found in any team."


#17 eveln

eveln

    Titan

  • Atomican
  • 16,389 posts
  • Location:Nth QLD

Posted 08 September 2017 - 06:59 AM

 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but because of the way this is being run, voting isn't mandatory?
 

 

No, you're not wrong there. However, apparently big mobs of new enrollments have been added. That still doesn't mean all pre- existing voters will bother, but given the stuff is mailed out and I gather paid envelopes (Aus post must be turning in their graves at the loss of profit, or is that where a goodly portion of the $122 million goes ? :P) will make it less of a chore for those particularly apathetic dudes ... they do still have to mark their preference of course, and whether that is managed in a clear and correct manner remains to be seen. It could all be messed up with whole truck loads of donkey votes.


 Laugh to Live . Live to Laugh.

atomic has π


#18 smadge1

smadge1

    Titan

  • Atomican
  • 25,747 posts

Posted 08 September 2017 - 12:54 PM

I don't think marrying anyone of any sex by post is a good idea...


Put your monkey where your mouth is. These are the voyages of the starship Lucy Liu. What's On My Mind? http://twitter.com/smadge1 http://smadge1.tumblr.com/

#19 Jeruselem

Jeruselem

    Guru

  • Atomican
  • 14,037 posts
  • Location:Not Trump-Land

Posted 08 September 2017 - 01:17 PM

Great, all the churchy people will be petitioning on the streets. I hate those people.


Having trouble with A [?]OS11.1?

 

2018 FIFA World Cup Russia - Australia in but Italy, Chile, Netherlands, USA = FAIL.


#20 Mac Dude

Mac Dude

    Immortal

  • Super Hero
  • 36,561 posts
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 08 September 2017 - 01:20 PM

i think it will be a lowish number disproportionate to the real sentiment of the people.

why?

i suspect potential negative voters are fairly homogeneous in terms of being highly motivated to participate, whereas potential positive voters sit on a much wider spectrum between enthusiasm and indifference, not to mention those who are antagonistic towards the whole damned sham of a process.


It's the indifferent folks that worry me. More and more I've come across people who are marginally yes because they can't see any reason same sex couples not to be married. However they may not have many/any friends who are impacted and it's these folks who may just forget to respond.

If it were a mandatory vote I wouldn't be concerned for the Yes campaign, but it's not for obvious reasons.

Great, all the churchy people will be petitioning on the streets. I hate those people.


You mean like these folks :

http://www.abc.net.a...arriage/8878680

Yeah, bastards.
Karl Kruszelnicki - No, I’m fully prepared to believe in the “Church of God the Utterly Indifferent who sets the universe going and says you’re on your own kids.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users