Jump to content

@~thehung

Superherø
  • Content Count

    5,937
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    83

Everything posted by @~thehung

  1. @~thehung

    Post Your Latest Real Life Purchase!

    near-fields themselves are even a partial 'real-world' compromise, versus full range far field speakers. but for classical music in particular, whats even less achievable for most of us at home, is a pristine lack of ambient noise — so even very high quality recordings tend to get some of their full dynamic range squashed before mastering. as for simplicity, in many cases just the completely untouched recording from a single pair of hard panned mics, of say, an orchestra with taiko drums, would sound pretty great in most ordinary rooms with half decent speakers. but the very same wouldnt sound so great played off a shitty stereo while moving about a house, or in a car, or over headphones. versatility would demand, at a minimum, probably some room mics mixed in to liven up the reverb (at the cost of muddying the stereo image) and compression, compression, compression (until the recording is a shadow of its former glory). again, compromises .
  2. @~thehung

    Post Your Latest Real Life Purchase!

    well yeah, but its ever a double-edged sword, innit! unfortunately with most mixes, which have not been created exclusively for cans, you are closer to the "true" sound when a requisite amount of direct left speaker sound is able to enter your right ear, and vice versa. all things being equal, that can be the most significant factor for fidelity, even beyond the positives/negatives of your meatsack body in the acoustics of your own particular listening space (sure to add variously delayed and low-pass filtered reflections from either speaker to each ear). its a fucking mess! a mix EQed and panned with surgical precision over studio monitors can sound gobsmackingly good in the room whilst astoundingly narrow and lifeless over headphones. conversely, a perfect headphone mix played through speakers is often a blurry cacophony of bullshit that is far worse. it sucks, but good mixing and mastering is the science of degrading the studio sound in the least worst way to please everyone — and headphone listeners tend to get the rawest deal. not to mention the most obvious missing ingredient with cans: sweet LF goodness.
  3. @~thehung

    Post Your Latest Real Life Purchase!

    i guess one reason for their popularity is, they bring ones head closer to the snacks. for example, much less effort to languidly fellate a Chocolate Covered Bourbon Soaked Twinkie while watching The Biggest Loser.
  4. @~thehung

    Post Your Latest Real Life Purchase!

    tell me something, since i guess youre fresh form auditioning other options. why do so many lounge designs have firm jutting headrests that force your head forward at an unnatural angle like they were designed by and for hunchbacks?
  5. @~thehung

    Whats everyones favourite movie and why??

    imo that crown goes to Breaking Bad, i would have said by a nose, were it not for the waning quality of the latter seasons of GoT, but then once it is conjoined to the eventually complete Better Call Saul, no contest.
  6. @~thehung

    Sandboxie goes free!

    good to know, although ive always been content with the limited nag screen version.
  7. @~thehung

    Green Room non-Googleable Music Quiz Game.

    never mind the big hint heres the answer: ...um.. actually nope. i got nothing :(
  8. @~thehung

    Whats everyones favourite movie and why??

    havent seen it, but its safe to say the best thing about it is the Key and Peele sketch. (would love to embed it for a quick laugh, but good luck viewing most of their clips thanks to the fascists at Viacom)
  9. @~thehung

    how crap is this government ?

    well, for all we know.... you're a CCP sypathiser!
  10. @~thehung

    Problems with the 737MAX ?

    huh? *googles* okay so he's the UK's Rube Goldberg
  11. @~thehung

    What's on your mind?

    well duh, thats obviously because they are part of a cancerous cabal that has been serving the malevolent agenda of globalist forces who are intent on undermining and destroying the Britain that we love.
  12. @~thehung

    What's on your mind?

    yeah, what is it about Corbyn? not basing this impression on anything specific he has said or done, but his whole manner just screams "I'm a thoroughly ineffectual git!" ...the kind of person who leaves admonishing notes on sharehouse fridges because nobody is following the rules he thought 'everyone' agreed to, like "Green vegetables should go on the LEFT side of the crisper!" and who will never find out who keeps stealing his pickles because everyone is always stealing his pickles, because nobody ever asked him to be in charge of the fridge, and because he's such an unlikeable ineffectual git. the potential leader of a country? potential parking inspector of a small country town more like.
  13. @~thehung

    Search settings

    @@~thehungI'm trying a thing where I can log in to your account via admin controls. Search pages are slow to load, but not giving the timeout you were getting. I'm not au fait with logging in as another user, so I can't rule out whether this problem is with your account or with your browsing device(s) :<
  14. @~thehung

    Search settings

    The search settings Please wait 2 minutes before attempting to continue reading of the forum at the present time "Please wait 8 minutes before attempting to finish reading this post"
  15. @~thehung

    Search settings

    okay, did that. still all SNAFUd up the wazoo. switched to new profile. logged in. search still borked. plus, couldnt log out (which was another orginal symptom, btw (1) ). restarted browser. made sure i was in the new profile. deleted all cache, cookies, the whole shebang. before logging in, tried to test search -- and BAM, i was fake logged in (2) -- and couldnt log out. deleted stuff, restarted, clicked on green room bookmark, already fake logged in, but click on "home" and not logged in, but click on "Tech Talk" etc, and fake logged in. dont know what to make of this. i will try to update this browser and see what happens before ditching it for a new install. (1) when i click the sign out button, i go to the forum root (https://forums.atomicmpc.com.au/?&_fromLogout=1) or i get a something went wrong page (Error code: 2S119/1) -- but either way, i stay fake logged in (2) cant submit posts ("saving..." flashes up after clicking "submit" but nothing happens), whilst i can still click on my name, open my profile, and open a text box by clicking on "Write a public message on your own feed". p.s. to actually submit this post, i had to save it to the clipboard, go back to https://forums.atomicmpc.com.au/ where i was not logged in, log in (again?) with "remember me", which got me the something went wrong page, and then i came back here to post for real haha p.p.s and even now, during this edit, if i go to https://forums.atomicmpc.com.au/ i get the Sign Up button — WTF mang!
  16. @~thehung

    What Are You Cooking?

    ive never been sure what scones are meant to be. had them once or twice as a kid, and once or twice as part of Devonshire Tea. never really sought them out, because they always seemed like improbably glorified damper to me. question is, assuming yeast is non-standard, how far can you go before youre not making a scone any more, but something else that already has a different name? personally, i prefer something like pulla (yep, more scandinavian shit :D) which is yeast based, and that dough without the cinnamon/cardamom and maybe a bit less sugar could work.
  17. @~thehung

    What Are You Cooking?

    how the did the taste/texture fall short? why the interest in using yeast?
  18. @~thehung

    What Did You Watch Lately ?

    this mondo nutjob: first, watch the original video: then, the parody :
  19. @~thehung

    Cyberpunk 2077 - 48 minutes preview!

    btw, where are you Cybes? well, at present it seems its only 14 new minutes...
  20. @~thehung

    What's on your mind?

    even if China backs it, how is it not still a cryptocurrency?
  21. woah, youve latched onto that one word and gone mental haha she didnt say, "I'm a very conservative person politically...". she probably meant conservative of temperament (since terminating your own pregnancy is an extreme intervention) and conservative sexually (because a no sex before marriage lifestyle choice tends to be very effective at eliminating all but the most unthinkable scenarios for an unwanted pregnancy). while its safe to assume 99% of social "conservatives" are "conservatives" politically, that does not mean the word is interchangeable and connotations within context can be overlooked. its also safe to assume theres a fair proportion of sexually promiscuous atheists who happen to be conservative voters, so it should be pretty fricken obvious that the main thrust of her comment was not to invoke an association with the entirety of those on the right of politics. moreover, with her answers, she was pretty much doing the exact opposite of what youre accusing her of! she resisted offering a personal view, repeatedly downplayed its supposed relevance, and generally displayed a level of reluctance befitting someone with a healthy respect for the separation between church and state. so who is she trying to make feel guilty? first she said "I don't want to make people feel guilty who have had to go down that path." later she said "Ben, you've been naughty in pushing me to say that, because I don't want anyone to feel guilty about decisions they've made, because I'm not in their shoes." oh, i see it now. it must have been the last bit that set you off: "...not in their shoes". she was clearly echoing the famous aphorism that says we should cast hasty judgments on people with different life circumstances. i see your point now. by the way, just as an aside, when she says "I've not been in a situation where I've had to contemplate that, and nor would I", i totally believe her. being someone who grew up as a god-fearing christian, theres every chance she knows to take precautions whenever she rolls over for Alan Jones.
  22. @~thehung

    Search settings

    thats a thing? must be something to do with their shared code base. its fresh.
  23. here's a question for you Kimmo: were you eating breakfast, lunch, or dinner when somebody took a shit in your cereal? yeah its a silly question, but it did lead to some discussion. what motivated it i wonder? my theory: Robzy is trying to settle an argument with his partner. she's all like "Grrr. Baked beans is not a romantic dinner! It's not even a dinner!" now that the first part is settled, i am awaiting the next thread, in which Robzy asks: "Is any meal eaten by candlelight romantic?"
  24. @~thehung

    What's on your mind?

    i disliked Niles for a while, but the skill of the actor grew on me. it was the father i couldnt stand. written poorly, yes, but holy jesus what a thoroughly unlikable overacting twat. still, it was the housekeeper and her bullshit accent that made me switch channels. BBT is perhaps the biggest and longest turd TV has ever produced.
  25. @~thehung

    What's on your mind?

    ive always been curious about that show and what the deal was with that character. but i never saw much more than a second of it. that Urkel thing made me want to smash shit just from the clips they'd play promoting the show. i just couldnt do it...switch channel over...okay okay fat dad...then the Urkel would walk in, yeah fuck this, i really thought i could do it, but i really cant do it haha
×