Jump to content
bu14-1

The Criminal Jewish and Israeli Connection to "9/11"

Recommended Posts

ZOMG!!

 

Proof that the Holocaust was an INSIDE JOB!!

 

 

 

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/isr...91028-hjb2.html

 

 

Israel's public relations problem in Britain, which is already severe, has just got significantly worse.

 

Over the past few weeks, the Jewish state has been publicly endorsed by two particularly controversial members of the far right.

 

Firstly, Nick Griffin, leader of the racist British National Party, which currently accepts only white people as members, declared that his was the only party to support Israel in its "war against terrorists" during Operation Cast Lead.

 

While Griffin, who was elected in June to the European Parliament, is not usually paid much attention, this time was different. He was speaking on Britain's most prestigious political television program, BBC's Question Time. The decision to invite him had proven so controversial that 8 million viewers tuned in, compared with the program's usual 2 to 3 million. The entire country was hanging on his every word.

 

Just three weeks earlier, the Conservative Party — now widely expected to win the next election — was embroiled in a national row over its alliance with another European member of parliament, Poland's Michal Kaminski.

 

Kaminski, who leads an important rightist bloc, has been disliked in Jewish circles since he declared in 2001 that the Poles should not apologise for the massacre of Jews by Polish residents of Jedwabne in 1941, unless "the whole Jewish nation [apologises] for what some Jewish Communists did in eastern Poland". There were also concerns that he had worn the Chrobry Sword, a symbol of the Catholic ultra-right in Poland and that he still maintained these unsavory connections.

 

So when, in early October, he appeared at the Conservative Party's annual conference, the main Jewish representative body – the archaically named Board of Deputies – wrote to Conservative leader David Cameron asking for reassurances. Labour's foreign minister, David Miliband, went on the attack and the ensuing media row, which is still ongoing – the Conservatives were forced to recently reassure Hillary Clinton on the subject — tarnished what should have been Cameron's moment of triumph.

 

But it did not go unnoticed that Kaminski was in Britain as the special guest of the Conservative Friends of Israel — who had also taken him, this summer, to Israel, where he was pictured smiling by the Western Wall and was welcomed by deputy foreign minister Danny Ayalon. Kaminski, it emerged, was considered a staunch friend of Israel in Brussels, where he regularly spoke up for its right to self-defence.

 

How is it possible for these men to be both far-rightists, with a history of outright Holocaust denial (Griffin) and of controversial comments about the massacre of Jews (Kaminski), and Israel supporters?

 

For Griffin certainly, but probably also for Kaminski, it is a strategic move. Supporting Israel allows them to claim that they are not really racists or anti-Semites, and gives them cover for other objectionable views. It also allows them to portray themselves, to their supporters, as opponents of the Muslims — a position that carries far more electoral benefit in today's Europe than being anti-Semitic.

 

But for Israel, this is a disaster. From now on, anyone in Britain supporting Israel publicly can be expected to be told they are holding a position only the racist BNP, or the likes of Kaminski, holds. It will many years to shake off these associations.

 

The disaster is compounded by the apparent embrace of Kaminski by Israel and some of its British supporters. No one can stop members of the far-right saying nice things about Israel in public. But does Israel really want to be seen in their company? At what point does their support for Israel become more important than racist and even anti-Semitic views?

 

Israel might argue that it needs to take its friends where it can find them. But this is extremely short-sighted. For local Jews and indeed anyone fighting racism, Israel's apparent embrace of Kaminski is a deep problem, because it makes it harder for them to object to a man with unsettling views on Jews. As for Israel itself, Griffin's poisonous embrace showed only too clearly that with friends like these, enemies are entirely unnecessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Griffin is an utter fuckwit.

 

Apparently 22% of Britons are willing to vote for the BNP in the next election. Now, some people will disregard this as racism, but that's not really the case.

 

The BNP represents what One Nation did - a reactionary response to a country completely fucked up by an insane policy of everyone-is-welcome to the point that London is now called Londonistan by even the most leftist of lefties.

 

In Australia, One Nation's policies were recognised by Howard for what they were and he took the wind out of her sails by implementing the non-contentious policies, leaving her looking like a free radical.

 

In England, Labour's trying to appease everyone and everything and the Tories are playing a small-target sensitive-new-age-guys strategy.

 

I couldn't care less if Griffin supported Israel, even though I suspect he supports it only because he hates those Arab-looking foreign types more than lily-white European Jews he's exposed to mostly.

 

That guy needs to be shut down. He is no better than a slightly more urbane Hitler with a hard-on for racial divisiveness and arianism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. We're all in on the Zionist conspiracy.

 

Now be quiet before I steal all your money, crucify a cherished celebrity and engage in a demonic orgy with millions of hot IDF chicks.

Edited by The Manta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting to see you don't blame Hitler for World War 2 or The Holocau$t. Or has Griffin done as bad or worse?

Did Leonid say that he doesn't blame Hitler for World War II or the Holocaust?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how many actually read the OP.

I'll be honest, at first I didn't.

 

Then I was bored, so I had a read, and my brain almost drained out of my ears.

 

Rob.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What the fuck has differing opinions on a people's origins got to do with "antisemitism"? Anyone can write Wikipedia articles. Can you provide evidence of "genetic evidence to the contrary"?

You can't have opinions on a people's origin. If someone comes from France, you can't have an opinion that they come from Malaysia.

 

Well you can, but then you'd be DUMB

 

Proof to the contrary: http://www.ftdna.com/pdf/43026_Doron.pdf

 

Interesting to see you don't blame Hitler for World War 2 or The Holocau$t. Or has Griffin done as bad or worse?

Did Leonid say that he doesn't blame Hitler for World War II or the Holocaust?

 

See, I was confused there too...

 

In short, DMB, get back on your meds and seek mental help.

Edited by Leonid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how many actually read the OP.

I did, and my immediate thought was "Hmm - how can I discourage this person from posting such shit on my forum ever again".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how many actually read the OP.

I did, and my immediate thought was "Hmm - how can I discourage this person from posting such shit on my forum ever again".

 

As the French would say, "Le marteau d'interdiction!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did, and my immediate thought was "Hmm - how can I discourage this person from posting such shit on my forum ever again".

NOOO, they got to David too!

Quick, someone in Sydney check he doesn't have scales forming on the back of his neck where they implanted the reptilian behaviour switch!

 

EDIT: Seriously though, DMB, or bt14, or whatever. 9 Jewish people got saved by a tardy reading? That's stupid. It's certainly not evidence that the jews are behind 9/11. You know 400-500 jews died in the 9/11 incident, right? Why send someone in to read slowly, and save that particular nine? It makes no sense once you are condemning 400+ of your fellow jews to a horrible death. And that's me taking five minutes to think about what I consider one of the most 'well supported' of your 'arguments'.

Edited by TinBane

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you posted it as 'evidence' to consider.

You've shown that some people consider mossad dangerous, and that there were some jews acting weird on 9/11. You know what? There were all kinds of people acting weird on 9/11.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck, I think I might have ordered a different kind of pizza than usual that night.

Well, that day most of the kids in my school wagged class to watch the news feeds.

OMG, Mossad Spies!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck, I think I might have ordered a different kind of pizza than usual that night.

Well, that day most of the kids in my school wagged class to watch the news feeds.

OMG, Mossad Spies!

 

Heh, I think we did it during class itself, under the pretense of 'monitoring World War III'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All this talk of Jews reminds me of my favourite biblical passage from the old testament:

 

"And the husband of Bathsheba did venture forth for Regal Super Kings that numbered two score and did leave Bathsheba alone in the tent. And David did enter the tent and did know Bathsheba. And David did kneel before Bathsheba, and lo, he did go at it like Popeye eating spinach."

 

(from 'The Book of Clive' Chapter 6, vv 3-5).

 

Shamelessly lifted from Roger's Profanisaurus: [url="http://www.viz.co.uk/profanisaurus.html"]

Edited by freck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how many actually read the OP.

I did, and my immediate thought was "Hmm - how can I discourage this person from posting such shit on my forum ever again".

 

HAHA *ouch!* lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"And the husband of Bathsheba did venture forth for Regal Super Kings that numbered two score and did leave Bathsheba alone in the tent. And David did enter the tent and did know Bathsheba. And David did kneel before Bathsheba, and lo, he did go at it like Popeye eating spinach."

I did no such thing! It's a Jewish conspiracy, I tells ya!

 

...

 

To the OP. Dude. You said "Please don't post any more", and then have posted yourself. It's only a little better than hanging around to comment on your own "I'm leaving because I'm misunderstood" thread. I can think of a number of ways - well, one, really - to help cure you of the problem you seem to be having.

 

Seriously. I have sat Shiva; I have observed Pasach. I find your attitude troubling in so many ways, yet I know I'm not going to convince you of it. I'm not even disagreeing with you, but look at it this way: I'm sure Catholics have committed heinous crimes, so too Protestants, Baptists, you name it. But to commute the sins of one or the few against the many is fucked up, and suggesting of a greater, more evil bias. It is entirely possible that yes, the Israeli armed intelligence services knew of the attack, but to then say it is a Jewish crime?

 

With utmost politeness, fuck off.

 

I will not countenance such on my forum. You have been told - let it drop. Do not peddle your worldview on this site. There are more appropriate and welcoming fora about the World Wide Web.

 

And I hope they all rot in hell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got stopped at the first thing again.

 

Some guy from a website that he doesn't maintain any more said some guy with the name of a dead Hungarian Olympic swimmer overheard some guys at a cemetery. In Hebrew!

 

So... you know a guy, who knows a guy, who heard some guys say something? He didn't record it, or get their names, or anything like that.

The witness's name and the names of the relevant FBI agents are there, but you'll see what you want to. It seems you don't see as interesting or relevant the fact that the conversation was heard in which the forthcoming terrorism was mentioned.
I realise this statement is somewhat redundant at this point, but: You don't know what a fact is.

 

If this is what you think a fact is, you think "Elvis is alive and living simultaneously in thousands of locations" is a fact.

Edited by tantryl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×