Jump to content
3dmark master

Atomic 3DMark & Game Benchmark Rankings

Recommended Posts

ooo tri fire very nice

link doesnt seem to work though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Link fixed (cheers for pointing that out DASA) and yeah, is fun playing with Trifire :D

 

Also did a 3DM11 run (barely nosing above your two GTX 480s tho DASA):

 

3DM11 - Triple GPU (ATI)

P12284 Philo-Sofa - i7 860 @ 4.2GHz HT (a) - CrossfireX (Trifire) HD 6990 @ 950/1450 MHz (a) HD 6950 (shader unlocked) @840/1325 MHz (a) - Screenshot

 

 

 

Stalker doesn't seem to like the Red team at all:

 

Stalker - Triple GPU (ATI)

345.3 Philo-Sofa - i7 860 @ 4.2GHz HT (a) - CrossfireX (Trifire) HD 6990 @ 950/1450 MHz (a) HD 6950 (shader unlocked) @840/1325 MHz (a) - Screenshot

Edited by philo-sofa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2133 Dasa - i7 2600K@4.48GHz(w) - SLI GTX480@925/2113(w)

looks like an extra 500mhz adds a whopping 31 points :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice DASA :)

 

I was going to try getting a whole suite of testing in with Tri-Fire, but the drivers just had an epileptic fit, half-blinding them to the 6950 and reducing performance to a crawl. As I can't be bothered doing that many driver re-installs I'll just go to the single 6990 for reviewing (and of course, benching) purposes for now. Can't say I'm been very impressed with ATI's multi-GPU driver stability over the last few months.

 

@ nuke - iirc those numbers are ballpark what I'd expect from a previous 2x6950 run on Stalker. Possibly X-ray just doesn't like ATI (I seem to remember something about that and notice no other reds have bothered to put up any results?) but either way it'll be very interesting to see how the solo 6990 fares.

 

 

EDIT: It seems it doesn't favour ATI silicon all that much, however the drivers (11.5) also don't seem to have been particularly well optimised for Tri-Fire. I only lost ~14% performance moving to dual-GPU.

 

Stalker - Dual GPU (ATI)

296.3 Philo-Sofa - i7 860 @ 4.2GHz HT (a) - CrossfireX HD 6990 @ 960/1475 MHz (a) - Screenshot

 

 

EDIT 2: This seems about consistent versus my unlocked 6950's results, given their respective clocks.

 

3DM11 - Dual GPU (ATI)

P10117 Philo-Sofa - i7 860 @ 4.2GHz HT (a) - HD 6990 @960/1450 MHz (a) - Screenshot

 

 

EDIT 3: And finally Heaven. Can't get Smartdoctor working without utter performance fail, really frustrating as even the newest build of Afterburner can't handle the ASUS VRM :/ Either way, interesting results compared to Tri-Fire which gave ~90% scaling over this Crossfire result, even with Tri-Fire's effective drop to x4, x4, x8 bandwidth.

 

Unigene Heaven 2.5 - Dual GPU (ATI)

1727 Philo-Sofa - i7 860 @ 4.2GHz HT (a) - HD 6990 @960/1450 MHz (a) Screenshot

Edited by philo-sofa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3DM11 - Dual GPU (ATI)

P9303 Kenno - i5 2500K @ 4.6GHz (stock cooler) - CF HD6950 @900/1450 MHz (stock cooler) - 3DMark11 Result

 

3DMVantage - Dual GPU (ATI)

P33021 Kenno - i5 2500K @ 4.6GHz (stock cooler) - CF HD6950 @900/1450 MHz (stock cooler) - 3DMVantage Result

Top 10 result on ORB for people with this setup :-)

Edited by Kenno

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All done, sorry for the late one!

 

Okay I've edit it a bit to include philo's results in the top multi gpu sections, no point being in a section on his own AND his result is challengable by dual gpu setups, so I thought it would fit in fine.

 

Any probs and I can switch into it's own no worries.

 

 

Also Philo, stalker has hated the red team for quite a while now, I may look at introducing another benchmark that would make for some more even footing.

 

Dasa, I hate you, that is all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its odd. When I first tried COP on a single GTX480 the FPS was abysmall (like 20-40fps average on highest) vs my girlfriends dual 5770s (around 70-80fps on highest)

 

But dual card performance felt a 400% increase. Might have just taken Nvidia a while to get decent drivers going.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well to be fair with stalker you did say ATI use HDAO, Nvidia use HBAO

each may be better optimised for ati\nvidia but im fairly sure hdao is a more advanced rendering method that is harder on hardware to try squeeze out a little more detail

 

with gtx480 sli at 875mhz 275.27 beta 2600k@4.3ghz

SSAO Mode - SSAO Quality

disabled 498

Posted Image

default - high 377

Posted Image

hbao - high 440

Posted Image

hdao - high 301

Posted Image

hdao - ultra cs 425

Posted Image

 

well its a bit of a mixed bag it would be interesting to see how modern ati cards with the latest drivers handle the other methods to

Edited by Dasa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting stuff. I'm in Wellington for work right now but if no one else steps up in the meantime I'd be happy to chuck the 6990 back in when I get home and re-test.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I purchased Metro 2033 tonight and ran the benchmark on my system at stock - memory at 1600Mhz otherwise everything else at stock values.

 

Average Framerate: 32.33

Max. Framerate: 69.66

Min. Framerate: 8.86

 

I'm posting this here both as a reference for myself (for when i get around to overclocking) and for anyone else who is interested in stock results.

**Submission**

Metro 2033 - Steam version

 

Average FPS: 39.3349.71 Smakme7757 - i7 2600k@5.4GHz(w) - GTX580@978/2215(w) - Proof

 

I'm really enjoying Metro 2033 so far. Awesome game :).

Edited by smakme7757

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3Dmark11

Single GPU

 

P4840 Nobodyishere - PII 955BE@3.6ghz(a) - 6970@950/1450(a)

 

Note, taken with basic edition, so doesn't give a futuremark link, so ive screen shot'd it with all the info shown.

 

 

Unigine Heaven 2.5

Single GPU

 

977 Nobodyishere - PII 955BE@3.6ghz(a) - 6970@950/1450(a)

 

Metro 2033

single gpu

 

30.33 Nobodyishere - PII 955BE@3.6ghz(a) - 6970@950/1450(a)

Edited by nobodyishere

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3DMark 11 - Dual GPU

P8218 Ceatc0 - W5580 @ 3.2Ghz(a) - HD5970@850/1200(s)

 

3DMark Vantage - Dual GPU

P30502 Ceatc0 - W5580 @ 3.2Ghz(a) - HD5970@850/1200(s)

 

 

Seems my 5970 is not too outdated yet...

Edited by ceatc0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ill give the 3d marks a shot (i cant run game benchies as i dont have a 1080P monitor)

 

results soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All updated!

 

Very nice work everyone!

 

Nobody - I'll allow the result, cos I'm nice

 

Ceatc0, very nice dual xeon system! You got some mean scores with that much grunt on the CPU score !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

**Submission**

 

3Dmark11

Single GPU Nvidia

P3202 DishD** - AII 240 @ 3.5Ghz(a) -GTX460@875/1820(a)

*Basic edition used*

** has been surpased refer to latest post =]

3Dmark06

Single GPU Nvidia

15669 3Dmarks DishD - AII 240 @ 3.6Ghz(a) -GTX460@875/1800(a)

*Basic edition used*

 

Unigine Heaven 2.5

Single GPU (DX11)

1054 DishD - AII 240 @ 3.5Ghz(a) -GTX460@875/1820(a)

*Basic edition used*

 

Stalker

Single GPU (DX11)

212.7 DishD - AII 240 @ 3.5Ghz(a) -GTX460@875/1820(a)

 

 

* understand if these results dont qualify due to basic editions beening use.

** Bugger I'v Just seen that my screen res are 1280x1024 for Heaven and Stalker, ma bad :(, giving myself an upper cut as i type this. Please dont bother with those two, but if ok id like to keep the post as a record, new monitor and cpu next week,sorry about that.

Edited by dishd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will definitely have to OC my gpus for some more benches soon, if dasa's results are anything to go off I should be right up there with this cpu :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Might as well post here for first post :p

 

3D Mark 11 *Basic Edition* (Because I'm poor)

 

P6051 i5 2500K @ 4.5Ghz (a) and Single 6970 @ 1000/1375 (a)

 

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/854/3dmark11.png/

 

I think that's all I need :S I will check the criteria then edit if I have to :D

-EDIT- Just realized I should be the fastest 6970 scorer for 3D Mark 11 by over 1000P points :D Thankyou 6970 Lightning for OC'ing like a boss

Edited by gummywormz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Might as well post here for first post :p

 

3D Mark 11 *Basic Edition* (Because I'm poor)

 

P6051 i5 2500K @ 4.5Ghz (a) and Single 6970 @ 1000/1375 (a)

 

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/854/3dmark11.png/

 

I think that's all I need :S I will check the criteria then edit if I have to :D

-EDIT- Just realized I should be the fastest 6970 scorer for 3D Mark 11 by over 1000P points :D Thankyou 6970 Lightning for OC'ing like a boss

yeah im heavily cpu limited, you could get a higher score if you overclock the mem on it as well, mine easily maxxed max catalyst limits of 1450mhz, yours should be able to do it if its the lightning edition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3Dmark11

Single GPU Nvidia

P3233 DishD -AII 240 @ 3.62Ghz(a) -GTX460@890/1850(a) ** updated score**

Edited by dishd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×