Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
gamble

Nvidia Rumors GTX 800 / 900 Maxwell

Recommended Posts

Looks like there might be 3 released by October under GTX 800 naming and GTX 990 in early 2015:

 

http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-...s-this-october/

http://www.tweaktown.com/news/39224/nvidia...tmas/index.html

http://www.tweaktown.com/news/38953/nvidia...2015/index.html

http://www.lazygamer.net/general-news/leak...formance-jumps/

 

Im curious if it will be 16, 20 or 28nm. Rumors so far say GTX 990 will be 16nm and skipping 20nm all together. Ive seen rumors saying that 20nm is having fab issues so 28nm will be for the GTX 800 series. If they are having issues with 20nm, not sure how they will do 16nm...

Edited by gamble

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.tomshardware.com/preview/preview,2-3941.html?key=0b1f023c7d6c4be0973d54029b55a7aab5bceab0

 

Naturally, none of the above matters if pricing is out of whack, but the good news is that it isn't. The GTX 980 carries an MSRP of $549, while the GTX 970 will go across the counter for $329. This bumps the GTX 760 down to $219.

----------

 

looks like just launched, looking at the benchmarks :0

 

Edit:

 

Wow the price/performance is very nice. Looks like a great launch. The 970 looks to be as strong as the 290x in most things.

Edited by gamble

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm more impressed with the power consumption! I was hopeful that these wouldn't use to much considering the Maxwell based GTX 750's sipped power, and things worked out pretty well :-)

Edited by nobody813

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite possibly my next GPU!

 

My system is begging for an upgrade.

 

You and me both. My computer hasn't booted in over a year. I want to fix it but might build myself a new system instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

impressive performance per watt without a die srink

be nice if they implemented gpu power down at idle like amd has so they use less power at idle in sli and if the monitor is asleep

 

the 256bit memory interface is less restrictive than i thought it doesnt seem to take any more of a hit than the gtx780ti at high res

both still lose some ground at 4k to the 512bit 290

 

die shrink of this with 6g 384bit memory and a bit bigger core will be a impressive bit of kit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit that nVidia really pulled a rabbit out of the hat and brought a sledgehammer to the Radeons. However, it really didn't disguise the fact that the GTX 780 should have been retired long ago. That's how I see it. If this was the game changer nVidia wanted, then it should have been brought in when R9 290/290X came out. But as I see it, AMD got the initial jump and we'll see what Red does to respond.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll probably buy a GTX 970 for the fun of it... Seems as fast as the 290x. The boost on some of these are crazy high if thermals allow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gtx980 overclocked to 1.5ghz boost is a tempting thing at us prices ~$550us but im going to wait it out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

impressive performance per watt without a die srink

...

the 256bit memory interface is less restrictive than i thought it doesnt seem to take any more of a hit than the gtx780ti at high res

 

die shrink of this with 6g 384bit memory and a bit bigger core will be a impressive bit of kit

die shrink? I think you mean node shrink, cause the die is smaller than GK110

 

Like Tonga 256bit is reasonable now thanks to compression magics

 

Yeah, GM210 will smack AMD around hard. Even an upscaled Tonga won't be able to compete I'd think.

 

 

Well played Nvidia, very impressive. Shame they decided to go sideways performance wise but they now definitely have thermal and power headroom for an even bigger Maxwell chip.

Edited by mark84

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question has been raised by a few whether or not the GTX 980 uses all available resources on its die. I just noticed a new product on PC Case Gear, the Leadtek Quadro K5200 8GB Workstation Card, which has 2304 CUDA cores, a 256-bit memory bus, and a 150W TDP, which is very close to the specs of the GTX 980, which is similar except for having 256 less CUDA cores, at 2048 total. This does make me wonder if there will be a GTX 980 Ti based off the same chip if AMD brings something more competitive than an R9 290X

Edited by nobody813

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like many are getting over 1500mhz OC on both cards.... Crazy

Edited by gamble

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question has been raised by a few whether or not the GTX 980 uses all available resources on its die. I just noticed a new product on PC Case Gear, the Leadtek Quadro K5200 8GB Workstation Card, which has 2304 CUDA cores, a 256-bit memory bus, and a 150W TDP, which is very close to the specs of the GTX 980, which is similar except for having 256 less CUDA cores, at 2048 total. This does make me wonder if there will be a GTX 980 Ti based off the same chip if AMD brings something more competitive than an R9 290X

As far as I'm aware, the 980 uses all resources on it's die, but it is a dimensionally smaller die than the 780ti, much in the same way as GTX 680 was a smaller die.

 

So there is the possibility/probability of them releasing a full sized GM210 chip down the track.

Edited by Captain Awesome!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im trying to locate the MSI version since Ive been doing research and it appears to have the best power delivery of the GTX 970's with 6+2 design. Supposedly, the EVGA version is one of the worst with 4+2 design and has coil whine. Also, some of the 970's appear to have different connections for monitor and to hook up the power to the card.

 

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2014/09/19/nvidia-geforce-gtx-970-review/1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im trying to locate the MSI version since Ive been doing research and it appears to have the best power delivery of the GTX 970's with 6+2 design. Supposedly, the EVGA version is one of the worst with 4+2 design and has coil whine. Also, some of the 970's appear to have different connections for monitor and to hook up the power to the card.

 

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2014/09/19/nvidia-geforce-gtx-970-review/1

As well as this: EVGA GeForce GTX 970 ACX has misaligned GPU vs heatpipes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think its misaligned as the core looks to be directly over the two main heapipes

they just tossed that one in for good measure i think which may knock a few c of the max temp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The heatpipe not touching gpu core while not ideal, still would function, heat would still get to it via the aluminium block the pipes are seated in.

 

Remember the days when heatpipes first came out and the pipes weren't directly touching CPU cores? They still worked, just not as efficently as direct contact (which came later).

 

Wouldn't call it a waste, but it's not the most efficient design.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe they re-used a cooler design from an OEM or earlier product, and called it good enough.

 

I'd be annoyed if I bought one and found that out though, it's a missed opportunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I ended up ordering the MSI GTX 970 4GD5T OC. Its not the MSI GAMING 4G but I hope it has the same vrm as the GAMING 4G. Just a new toy to play with for a nice side-grade fun :)

Edited by gamble

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I ended up ordering the MSI GTX 970 4GD5T OC. Its not the MSI GAMING 4G but I hope it has the same vrm as the GAMING 4G. Just a new toy to play with for a nice side-grade fun :)

 

On the subject of GTX9xx rumours, MSI haven't released their top end Lightning cards, which leads many to believe that a Ti version is in the works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking of pulling the trigger on a 980. Good time to buy or wait a bit?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could wait for AMDs response Plods, R9 390X rumor floating around, even a picture if its cooler housing (hints at hybrid cooling ah la 295X2).

 

If 390X shows up, it will likely be faster but hotter and draw more power.

 

If you want ultimate speed, maybe wait or go 295X2, otherwise 980 is a nice bit of kit if you're wanting GTX 780 (Ti) class performance or looking to OC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read a few places that the 390x is the same die as the 290x just the 290x had some disabling. If thats true then the efficiency is going to be bad. I probably should have waited though for AMD response but more just to play with a new piece and maybe Ill do another side-grade with AMD in a few months if I dont lose money doing so I dont mind lol

 

I kinda dont get the gtx 980 since the gix 970 is so well priced, you could spend just another 100 bucks to get two 970s for sli...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×