Jump to content
Forum upgrade is live! Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Casmo

What is making my mac slow?

Recommended Posts

What model, what OS, how much Ram?

 

Could give something like CCleaner a go. Newer OSes with under 4 Gig Ram aren't a real good idea. There's cutoff for earliest machine supported by OSes and if you're near the start it's likely to not perform real well.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're running a newer macOS on an older machine, it's expected not to perform very well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, is it a good idea to use cleaning tools for Mac?

 

First of all, you should shut down unneeded background programs and delete all useless files. Or you can use a cleaning tool. Find more useful info here - macprocleaner.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That site looks like a 1 man operation... and unless you need to be browsing with an actual Mac, it looks like he's forgotten to put any download links on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hi guys, is it a good idea to use cleaning tools for Mac?

 

First of all, you should shut down unneeded background programs and delete all useless files. Or you can use a cleaning tool. Find more useful info here - macprocleaner.com

 

 

Yeah I wouldn't trust the joke of a website if you literally paid me.

Do NOT use any tips from that site.

 

Things simply are bullshit, and while there's no software or anything to download YET, on there, I'm betting it will soon appear.

 

 

What will happen if I do not clean my Mac from the junk files and duplicates?

The worst outcome you should expect is when in the middle of some important work process your computer simply freezes. Of course, you can always restart it and get back to your task. However, this can repeat a few times during the day. Moreover, the booting of some apps can take twice more time than before. Finally, having too many duplicates of media files can cause cluttering of your disk soon. As a result, you’ll reach the virtual memory threshold.

 

I mean, for anyone who's not IT savvy, this is all just bullshit.

Lies.

False.

 

"Junk Files" and "Duplicates" are not only, occasionally necessary, but will NEVER do anything more than Fill your HDD up.

 

And it has NOTHING to do with "Virtual Memory" rofl!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The biggest joke is that the website has no actual downloads or links to downloads.

 

At first I just thought it was a case of browser ID check where you only get relevant links depending on your computer and OS.

Check using Safari on the Mac, same thing.

Then have a look around. It seems there's a Facebook page and Kickstarter page.

 

Seems to me a huge case of Vaporware and this guy's trying to raise money in aid of software that probably exists only in his imagination... and whether any money raised would go to that cause ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to an interesting bug with firefox an extension I found the other month, I actually did have a scenario where my PC ran like shit because firefox would fill up all available RAM, and then fill up all available virtual memory, and only then do a garbage collection round that freed up SFA.

 

But it didn't make the computer freeze and hang and that's it. It just killed the runaway process - firefox.

 

I can't imagine that a system with virtual memory set to dynamic, and a full drive so it can never really create a swap file, might do some odd things. But probably not what the warning on the site says.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to an interesting bug with firefox an extension I found the other month, I actually did have a scenario where my PC ran like shit because firefox would fill up all available RAM, and then fill up all available virtual memory, and only then do a garbage collection round that freed up SFA.

 

But it didn't make the computer freeze and hang and that's it. It just killed the runaway process - firefox.

 

I can't imagine that a system with virtual memory set to dynamic, and a full drive so it can never really create a swap file, might do some odd things. But probably not what the warning on the site says.

 

That's just the classic FireFox memory leak, its been present since the start, and there's almost no way to control it.

A lot comes from the way ads work these days, in that they're always "updating" and the page 'grows' with each update.

 

If I leave my work browser open for a weekend, with about 20 tabs, when I get back to work on Monday it's taking 8GB of "Memory" up from 600mb.

This is normal behavior, even on a fresh install.

 

Waterfox is less of a culprit.

 

Opera is pretty decent too; while still being webkit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not the classic firefox memory leak, it was a specific bug with a specific extension and specific websites.

 

I know because apart from the bugzilla ticket, the issue disappeared as soon as I stopped using that addon with buzzfeed open.

 

Also because I regularly have hundreds of tabs open for weeks at a time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not the classic firefox memory leak, it was a specific bug with a specific extension and specific websites.

 

I know because apart from the bugzilla ticket, the issue disappeared as soon as I stopped using that addon with buzzfeed open.

 

Also because I regularly have hundreds of tabs open for weeks at a time.

 

Strange, because I still see that same behavior on fresh windows installs without plugins on Firefox.

It doesn't seem nearly as bad on Linux, though.

 

I wonder whats causing it on my base installs.... hmm...

Edited by Master_Scythe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WTF would anyone want hundreds of browser tabs going?

 

"FISTING001.JPG" "FISTING002.JPG" "FISTING003.JPG"

OK... suppose I understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WTF would anyone want more than 10 pages in their newspaper?

 

It's easier to keep specific research related pages open and minimised, rather than digging through bookmarks menus trying to find something specific.

 

 

And, yeah, it's strange. NFI what you're doing to Firefox, MS, but I'll PM you a link to my bug report to see just how fucked up the memory usage actually was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WTF would anyone want more than 10 pages in their newspaper?

 

It's easier to keep specific research related pages open and minimised, rather than digging through bookmarks menus trying to find something specific.

 

 

And, yeah, it's strange. NFI what you're doing to Firefox, MS, but I'll PM you a link to my bug report to see just how fucked up the memory usage actually was.

 

Had a read, that was pretty hectic.

Yeah I'm not sure either. I know it's a memory leak, because if I kill the process, then relaunch and 'recover my tabs', the memory usage is normal again.

If it wasn't a leak, and was content based, it'd load to near the same usage.

 

Waterfox is affected less for me, so I'm a full time convert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you hit garbage collection in about:memory to see what happens, rather than killing the process?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you hit garbage collection in about:memory to see what happens, rather than killing the process?

 

No, I didn't know about this, thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×