Jump to content
NZT48

my politics

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Foreign Policy

  • Pull out of The War On Terror. It was a sham from the beginning and makes Australians less safe, not more safe.
  • Use Australian Defence Force for defence
  • Do not participate in any wars of aggression
  • Pursue “Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations — entangling alliances with none.”
  • End all government foreign aid and sell all government foreign aid assets
  • Ban foreign ownership of Australian land and buy back all foreign-owned Australian land
  • Withdraw from United Nations. It is a Satanic organisation.

Taxation, Revenue and Subsidies

  • No income tax
  • No GST
  • No company tax
  • No tax on cigarrettes
  • No tax on alcohol
  • Tariffs of 10% on all imports
  • An approximate cost to society of crimes is to be calculated, doubled and imposed as fines, doubled each instance of re-offence
  • No subsidies
  • No luxury car tax

Health

  • No PBS
  • Government-funded health care only for contagious diseases with the amount of funding being determined by how serious the disease is and how contagious the disease is.
  • All government health assets unrelated to contagious diseases are to be sold.
  • Abortion pill illegal
  • No mandatory vaccination
  • No forced medication, including water fluoridation. If people want to consume fluoride they can consume a controlled dosage of pharmaceutical-grade fluoride.

Education

  • The government is to have nothing to do with education
  • All government education assets are to be sold

Sexual Morality and Reproduction

  • Marriage is the life-long union of a man and a woman
  • All divorce illegal
  • All fornication illegal, forgiven in the case where the fornicators get married
  • All abortion to be treated the same as any other murder

Miscellaneous

  • Remove all regulations of business
  • Repeal all anti-discrimination legislation
  • Australian citizenship only for indigenous and White Australians
  • Priority immigration from UK, USA, Canada and NZ
  • Complete freedom of communication except where a contract voluntarily entered into prohibits it
  • No government welfare
  • No government funding for tourism
  • Make cannabis possession and use legal
  • Relax firearm laws
  • Legalise nuclear power with desalination plants and nuclear waste dumping in the desert
  • Sell ABC and SBS
  • Ban forced circumcision
  • Pay back the debt

 

What do you think?

What would you change if you could? 

Edited by NZT48

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you might as well relax all laws don't you think ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should justify why you want all of that, and not just make statements.

Like, I don't know, throw us a bone on why you think Australia and not America should become Gilead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See, I'm of an age where I think even smoking the green leaf should be done with extreme caution.  ... and that's only cos I survived it, there are plenty who don't and use it as a stepping stone to more addictive rubbish. And rubbish it truly be.

But I do think it should not be the end of your career or social life to be caught with it.  That;s just silly imo. unless your job is to be straight and looking after the sick and maimed in hospital that is.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Abortions need to be more freely avaliable

ban tobacco, as there are no health benefits regarding this drug

ban all religious organizations, belief in an invisible man in the sky is a mental illness

Edited by TheManFromPOST
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TheManFromPOST said:

belief in an invisible man in the sky is a mental illness

Reaction for that.

But seriously, "As it harm none, do as thou wilt" - ie: there should be no bans on anything unless others suffer for it.  Of course you still get to argue about what suffering is and what qualifies as people.

 

Re the commented line: Personally, I think you're free to believe whatever kooky shit you think, but if you poison kids' minds with it you're deserving of child abuse charges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but dont shove your invisible man down my throat!

you have read about my medical issues over the last year, a few people have come to me saying i need to come to their church as that god can help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking at your list, I can see one that will not resonate in the public, sexual morality and reproduction.  In a democracy, you will probably get away with all the rest of your policies as they are choices for the public.  However, sexual morality and reproduction, that one's a bit personal and is going to take some doing to legislate and enforce.

I will get right to it.  There are only 2 sovereign countries in the world where the statements and the laws, with respect to sexual morality and reproduction, you list exists.  The first is the Vatican, and second, the Philippines.  Now, the mess the Philipines in, at least with morality and reproduction in mind, and where Christianity constitutes 92% of the population (80% of which is Roman Catholic), is as a consequence of these kinds of policies and laws.  Do you want our nation to go down that direction?

Okay, let's just say that the population does accept those policies but then comes the anti-fornication laws, married couples excepted.  How the hell are you going to enforce that?  Remember, we are a democracy, and a socialist country and you are basically asking all the fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters friends, etc, to report on your fornication activities so that you may be charged with a crime.

So basically, on the basis of your policies, alone, I find it hard to support you for candidacy for any government.  I mean, there wouldn't be any government at all, really, because it would be pretty much a dictatorship or tyrannical one-party primarily Christian sect government led by only white supremacists.  How long do you think that Indigenous Australians would have a chance considering your views and policies? 

Food for thought?  Maybe not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, strifus said:

Food for thought?  Maybe not?

I doubt it. Unfortunately,  rabid Christian and anti-vaxxer alone is a recipe for someone whos mind is so set in stone, its neanderthal. 

For the rest of enlightened, evolved society it might be. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why citizenship only for whites and indigenous people

people from China have lived in Australia for generations, they have the same right to citizenship as anyone else

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

"Freedom! Little/no Government! Except when I personally don't like it, in which case BIG BROTHER SHOULD WATCH YOU FUCK!!! LEGISLATE, OUTLAW, PUNISH!!!!! IRON FIST!!!!!"

Literally you.

Edited by SquallStrife
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see no government schools and all private schools so churches can brainwash all the kids ... great

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry dude.  Conservative christian politics won't generally fly with a very left leaning moderate atomic community.

Economically those politics would be a disaster.   Socially, they would be a disaster with the removal of many personal freedoms. While it might work for Mad as a Hatter Katter or Nutty Nile (they are as close as I can think of to them), it certainly wouldn't get you votes here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

According to this ...

https://annualreport.ato.gov.au/02-performance-reporting/operational-performance/revenue-collection

No GST, Income tax or company tax. That's like most of the tax collected by the ATO so the government would run out of money ... pretty quick. Meaning it would need to borrow from RBA or from overseas just to function.

Edited by Jeruselem

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember NZT48.  He was the guy that was arguing for bringing back the gold standard to value our currency.  

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, strifus said:

I remember NZT48.  He was the guy that was arguing for bringing back the gold standard to value our currency.  

 

No mention of Gold in his post!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Jeruselem said:

No mention of Gold in his post!

Is there a gold standard when it comes to politics?  I'm sure he would prefer a theocracy, however is democracy actually a gold standard?  Do we have any politicians who might be considered even close to a gold standard?  Paul Keating? Gough Whitlam? How about overseas?  Barrack Obama?

Does anyone measure up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chaos.Lady said:

Is there a gold standard when it comes to politics?  I'm sure he would prefer a theocracy, however is democracy actually a gold standard?  Do we have any politicians who might be considered even close to a gold standard?  Paul Keating? Gough Whitlam? How about overseas?  Barrack Obama?

Does anyone measure up?

We got fecal standard of pollie though! Like the last three twats

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Jeruselem said:

We got fecal standard of pollie though! Like the last three twats

Hmmm... now I feel like I'm over in the other thread talking about @scruffy1's bowel motions... 😛

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/7/2018 at 6:42 PM, NZT48 said:

Australian citizenship only for indigenous and White Australians

Heil Hitler.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/8/2018 at 5:48 AM, strifus said:

However, sexual morality and reproduction, that one's a bit personal and is going to take some doing to legislate and enforce.

It is easy to legislate. We should make what is wrong illegal regardless of how easy it is to enforce and we already have legislation about sexual morality that is equally (un)enforceable yet I don't see anyone complaining about that legislation.

On 10/8/2018 at 5:48 AM, strifus said:

Now, the mess the Philipines in, at least with morality and reproduction in mind, and where Christianity constitutes 92% of the population (80% of which is Roman Catholic), is as a consequence of these kinds of policies and laws.  Do you want our nation to go down that direction?

Please elaborate. What is the mess and why do you believe it "is as a consequence of these kinds of policies and laws"?

On 10/8/2018 at 5:48 AM, strifus said:

How long do you think that Indigenous Australians would have a chance considering your views and policies?

What do you mean by this?

On 10/8/2018 at 6:44 AM, TheManFromPOST said:

why citizenship only for whites and indigenous people

Because that is who the land rightly belongs to, just like China is for the Chinese.

On 10/8/2018 at 10:15 AM, SquallStrife said:

"Freedom! Little/no Government! Except when I personally don't like it, in which case BIG BROTHER SHOULD WATCH YOU FUCK!!! LEGISLATE, OUTLAW, PUNISH!!!!! IRON FIST!!!!!"

Literally you.

I still want freedom. Like I said: we already have legislation about sexual morality, so why not make it completely right instead of just partly right? Why do I not see you complaining about existing sexual morality legislation?

On 10/8/2018 at 11:32 AM, Jeruselem said:

I see no government schools and all private schools so churches can brainwash all the kids ... great

I don't propose any ban on non-Christian organisations starting or controlling schools so what's the problem?

On 10/8/2018 at 12:14 PM, Chaos.Lady said:

Economically those politics would be a disaster.

Rubbish. They would be about the best thing for the economy.

On 10/8/2018 at 12:14 PM, Chaos.Lady said:

Socially, they would be a disaster with the removal of many personal freedoms.

Why?

On 10/8/2018 at 1:08 PM, Jeruselem said:

According to this ...

https://annualreport.ato.gov.au/02-performance-reporting/operational-performance/revenue-collection

No GST, Income tax or company tax. That's like most of the tax collected by the ATO so the government would run out of money ... pretty quick. Meaning it would need to borrow from RBA or from overseas just to function.

Did you miss all the saving measures and the introduction of tariffs that I mentioned?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, NZT48 said:

I still want freedom. Like I said: we already have legislation about sexual morality, so why not make it completely right instead of just partly right? Why do I not see you complaining about existing sexual morality legislation?

"I still want freedom, except when I think there should be less freedom."

Literally you.

Reconcile your own hypocrisy before you concern yourself with my views.

You're continuously bellowing about freedom. Freedom freedom freedom. Then in the same breath you want the GOVERNMENT, the BIG BAD GOVERNMENT that needs to go away, to concern itself with people's private, personal affairs.

YOU. ARE. A. HYPOCRITE.

7 hours ago, NZT48 said:

Rubbish. They would be about the best thing for the economy.

Where is your budgetary estimate to support this statement?

Most of the data you would need to produce such a report is public knowledge, so go and figure it out.

The fact that your policies are philosophically sound to you is a terrible argument for economic reform.

 

Edited by SquallStrife
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Problem with no Income Tax is... How to do think Public Highways are financed to be built & maintained ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×